Hello All,
I have a question in regards to Uplink monitoring/Balancing.
I have a branch office where I have two WAN connections.
1.) A 100Mbps Fiber point-2-point over a /29 subnet that goes back to HQ. Let's just call it 10.1.1.2/29 and the other end at HQ will be 10.10.1.1/29
2.) My other WAN connection is a T1 with a static routable Inet address. XX.***.***.30/29
In this particular setup I have Uplink Monitoring and Balancing enabled.
When the primary link(100 Mbps P2P)goes down I want the T1 to pick up and then start up an IPSEC VPN connection back to HQ . I have it working fine, but my issue is how do I handle not masquerading of the P2P line? Right now to get this to work I have to NAT my branch office behind the 10.10.1.2 interface(which is part of the Uplink group) interface so that if I fail over to T1 then everything stays the same. I would prefer to not NAT my branch office behind it, but rather just route across the 10.1.1.0/29 net as I normally would.
Am I missing something obvious?
I have a question in regards to Uplink monitoring/Balancing.
I have a branch office where I have two WAN connections.
1.) A 100Mbps Fiber point-2-point over a /29 subnet that goes back to HQ. Let's just call it 10.1.1.2/29 and the other end at HQ will be 10.10.1.1/29
2.) My other WAN connection is a T1 with a static routable Inet address. XX.***.***.30/29
In this particular setup I have Uplink Monitoring and Balancing enabled.
When the primary link(100 Mbps P2P)goes down I want the T1 to pick up and then start up an IPSEC VPN connection back to HQ . I have it working fine, but my issue is how do I handle not masquerading of the P2P line? Right now to get this to work I have to NAT my branch office behind the 10.10.1.2 interface(which is part of the Uplink group) interface so that if I fail over to T1 then everything stays the same. I would prefer to not NAT my branch office behind it, but rather just route across the 10.1.1.0/29 net as I normally would.
Am I missing something obvious?